Birdwatch Note
2024-02-02 06:25:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
Written by FD2C3C437C3474315F3D80C0146C7DB6B77CC01B675FBD786A058DD8DBE2D0EB
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1753134524047978784
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1753303604612722854
- noteId - 1753303604612722854
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - FD2C3C437C3474315F3D80C0146C7DB6B77CC01B675FBD786A058DD8DBE2D0EB Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1706855128803
- tweetId - 1753134524047978784
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2024-02-02 06:25:28 UTC (1706855128803) |
2024-02-02 11:13:34 UTC (1706872414480) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-02-03 03:17:17 UTC (1706930237317) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 2024-02-02 11:13:34 UTC (1706872414480) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-02-02 19:00:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 13:31:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 13:13:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 11:50:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 10:54:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 10:30:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 10:16:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 10:11:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 09:59:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 09:27:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 06:22:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 05:29:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 05:10:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 05:09:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 04:37:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 04:08:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 03:56:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 03:55:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 03:26:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 03:06:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 03:06:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 03:00:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 02:37:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 02:36:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 02:15:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 02:14:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 01:36:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 01:05:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 01:01:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 00:45:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 00:36:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-03 07:20:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-03 04:12:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-03 03:56:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 20:38:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-08 02:58:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 06:22:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 05:40:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-07 14:18:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-03 08:17:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-03 03:50:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-03 02:55:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-03 01:47:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-03 01:43:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 21:24:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 18:25:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 14:42:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 10:40:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 10:19:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 09:36:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 08:12:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 07:16:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 06:56:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 06:46:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 06:10:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 05:23:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 05:18:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 05:09:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 04:26:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 04:23:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 04:17:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 03:46:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 02:41:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 02:05:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 02:05:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 01:08:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-02 00:58:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-02 01:22:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-02 16:53:28 -0600 | Rating Details |