Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-03 07:43:45 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: BA4EF721E110F0B46B700E76A4262EC0D4197CD046416747923C7CF6B677C33C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details