Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-02 22:53:28 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0685EE20A8B91E74580634D6CA96F2E9CA6886F7D84B20D210C1A07335BDBEAD
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details