Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 16:16:48 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 804D5EBD7CBE8A6EB0B09968180936F2220320C890BA0983D31F237F55CAB0B3
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details