Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 07:08:36 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 8FCCDB5805B9F84B18137A85889FDA489259B95DA1D4387595C6AC0C22113AA2
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details