Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-02 07:22:56 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: EC9A0852922DF3A49009DF0D49FA298040B2A9523ACD3D46AC96EF4F2F9C8E74
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details