Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 11:09:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 6142F7A2AD1ED92B4858110DD8503B07534FBF7C017D2FB16568326FB0318C9C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details