Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 12:22:42 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E5A4CFFBD654E9B0EE51BD22409C585DC229946A6A2FA79AB8892F8D6B7133D2
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details