Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 16:11:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E32BCEF810203CFE07DF6F62B4DCF09C35EC0A2BE73BEE35DC0F9CE07B26E310
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details