Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 08:14:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: A9FC8FAE2AD76A416CEFF0A1BB7065C3CF8EC8C08F23497C89E3988B072EF64C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details