Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 15:59:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: CC2967A732E98CFBDDA9A04A3868103D7B0CA5A057C0A2FDA14138DF33166B14
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details