Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 11:29:24 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 88BBCB4C08494145A177F61A7C3636155CE16B9B96C6D0B32DCA4A2C1E27FD42
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details