Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 19:31:00 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F95CC476F501A763ACA60A126AAFF4B2A55C4691BB72A39A66B5C018FB85B365
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details