Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-03 00:25:50 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: EEA80A53EB1860C0DF241F576C4B62AB060252303876C67085E8863B5AB02DE6
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details