Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-03 08:55:09 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: A510B6ABC05CF0896AC1FB321B87376CD2EFC4FEB4D6A13B30D8617C4C8A155A
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details