Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 08:05:40 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 98A3EB586CB34BCD2C7C64DE04D959800962C3791B50CAF4164BCCD62CC0ECDB
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details