Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 11:18:56 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 088A9325F54E288D1A2D9A8586B25B9B69243C9B64300370E3065B6D7F1BF312
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details