Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 07:01:50 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0ED306BCCFC66ACC789F4C14826B866165EE6A29EA9E7873E4921415EF3AB13B
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details