Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 17:50:54 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 79844BFDC2C410E6D97ADB3166EC1F807AF11289814C6E645760654ABAFEB7A6
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details