Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 06:45:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 643AEF2B7AA1A29A9580B72982EB15A9F4229C385280DF8F80A25587F76F0F94
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details