Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-03 09:50:36 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 437E70852E76DAC49CBD3D07A72DC57B917728FB68F48BAA8AF5C815977603DB
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details