Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-03 09:56:19 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D823A784F3814655E56E73D9C72D6E9DB5C99BD56F982C669D40C2363F856F12
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details