Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 11:09:59 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: AC6743557DE4DBE65108EA69ADE6E64FFD2F1AC44EC189472E3A015F1BEFC129
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details