Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 09:00:53 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B0E6A5A374C7EF7B0BD58F1B9B1A2B10F05117E0894FEFFF0C4659513C9B8FB3
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details