Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 12:46:15 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0AB9E20F50AF4FAD139D737E6DA00775BB9F9DB0D9FD2DDFAE91520E9C044AFB
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details