Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 14:12:03 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 2F8B7DEBDFBC8F49B34A944781E87ED7A31A54B852286CD2A93C9F1E1B5CF871
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details