Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 20:42:21 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 5A94B5DCA834E271EA0B2FE3A6361A3A8BD97D4E69D905C406C18C47F86B800C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details