Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 13:16:41 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 2635D2728060C23D2AE826FC60D8E30B922252808093455BBD5594C9AC49CE44
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details