Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-02 12:56:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D973725140DCC74CE14BDFB571AB672D310579195B4E27630E65269ADBC59740
Participant Details
Original Note:
Some of Eysenck's papers were found "unsafe" because the quality of the data was doubtful and the results were not reproducible. Moreover, concerns were raised as early as the late 1980s, well before Eysenck's death. https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HE-Enquiry.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal
All Note Details