Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-19 19:37:14 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.

Written by D223B6605BBF8F2224CF0D1BBAA43CBBA5155B11F7929EFB2B65D35F462553E3
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1715089745024626992
• noteId - 1715089745024626992
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - D223B6605BBF8F2224CF0D1BBAA43CBBA5155B11F7929EFB2B65D35F462553E3 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1697744234697
• tweetId - 1715086535127699767
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 1
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.