Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-19 19:41:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4D256FEA15FB1F20B42E655A2E0009840F18A11040A37A342B3FC4D41F1C7189
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details