Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-19 19:45:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4BBFB2F7C51B7C2CD356BE936025132E7ED022967ACE1C09EC7801F799E7E6CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715089745024626992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4BBFB2F7C51B7C2CD356BE936025132E7ED022967ACE1C09EC7801F799E7E6CE
  • createdAtMillis - 1697744700467
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17150897450246269924BBFB2F7C51B7C2CD356BE936025132E7ED022967ACE1C09EC7801F799E7E6CE