Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-20 15:37:06 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F7A811DB5F3A1310B565646CA1B5059A542E45BCB086F7F768A4D2F2DB5312D8
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details