Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-20 01:09:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 15E560BB126A583815A7998469D7F07C54CB5508C9A8C0A241D489CBE7A15088
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details