Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-19 19:53:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6E74DFFF003730C0EE5DD646740FD949EC718CF2FFB38D43A99C3C20EC661C14
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715089745024626992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6E74DFFF003730C0EE5DD646740FD949EC718CF2FFB38D43A99C3C20EC661C14
  • createdAtMillis - 1697745195495
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17150897450246269926E74DFFF003730C0EE5DD646740FD949EC718CF2FFB38D43A99C3C20EC661C14