Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-19 20:08:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4130457A905F4CF0CC07A07D4E55353F79FC99B8928DEB068B1EB779BDE7A631
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details