Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-20 14:04:28 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E5E95119AF700E8743615C9A060B4C8669F8CE39D9EC815B3A15ECE8AB2C8BD0
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details