Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-19 19:44:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 741001D9CEA075C0141B83708080DD4DA2A0ACE57AAED0BC214A39D3A9C00420
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details