Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-19 19:52:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 5E9178492435BFEE32743510ECBC5480CB2BE35647E7B35E990E7092846427E6
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details