Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-19 19:53:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F38C197FE109977E8FA2A806B1D9DDED6F7073BA06FBA01C36635D730C5AD8C7
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details