Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-20 05:36:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D9A709C2CBF11ADF41CB30947FD5B662D32B63F126A05EE726D3D91D75B55A3A
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715089745024626992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D9A709C2CBF11ADF41CB30947FD5B662D32B63F126A05EE726D3D91D75B55A3A
  • createdAtMillis - 1697780167793
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715089745024626992D9A709C2CBF11ADF41CB30947FD5B662D32B63F126A05EE726D3D91D75B55A3A