Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-20 18:05:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 03945F761E30146C14BDB1BA96B5D6C747731E15F4591AEC988B9CBAF41D9CAD
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details