Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-19 19:51:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6AE33A6D45E86B044FB062236EE7769B45709859BC5FFE7D976D444692BACB15
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715089745024626992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6AE33A6D45E86B044FB062236EE7769B45709859BC5FFE7D976D444692BACB15
  • createdAtMillis - 1697745094066
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17150897450246269926AE33A6D45E86B044FB062236EE7769B45709859BC5FFE7D976D444692BACB15