Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-19 20:03:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 5DC35EA2B3C82F1CCE576526266501D684642107CAC4F81A433FE16CD88349F3
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details