Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-20 09:49:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 2C9BC68A5651B0BE46F39B633D87B0321A9E433EC663F2A8A36A71A07A299161
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details