Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-19 19:39:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 83454823BE23C8CB07C0C9AEB04924CB1B14E0D7C39303A9C699A54509F0C382
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details