Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-19 20:21:00 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 296395DAB12F4EC3DB1A04137D18A5F591192974741F6B810A2F1E5905523A20
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details