Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-19 20:47:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 2E5679D2BE99235A82BF31AA861ADC9A80170A65BA460702FE65DA7B0E1A4943
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details