Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-20 00:05:10 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D7621110D23F2F5326C4A4B5BB7686EDD48B4485BB91E1BBDA7FE2EA41083564
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details