Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-19 20:37:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 84A81A7A4EB77E13D47D5BF6C07EF04C4990D99BED71923AE7BD1FA81BDEDC46
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details